Both run through the same Meta Ads Manager, use the same targeting, and get budgeted as one line item more often than they should. The two platforms don’t actually cost the same, and they don’t perform the same for the same kind of business.
This is about splitting ad budget between the two platforms specifically. For paid search versus paid social overall, see Facebook Ads vs. Google Ads. For Instagram’s growing role as a search engine in its own right rather than an ad platform, see how much that actually matters.
In the Feed, Instagram’s average cost per click runs close to $3.35, against Facebook’s $1.86, nearly double. Move to Stories, though, and the gap mostly closes: Instagram runs about $1.83, Facebook around $1.86. Reach-based pricing tells a different story. Instagram’s Feed CPM, at roughly $7.68, is only about 3% higher than Facebook’s $7.47, so if the goal is raw impressions rather than clicks, the two platforms cost about the same.
Instagram has fewer ad placements than Facebook, so competition for each slot runs hotter, especially during busy periods. That’s most of what’s driving the Feed CPC gap. On the other side of the ledger, Instagram users engage with content at a meaningfully higher rate (one comparison put it at roughly 23% more interaction than Facebook users), which is the tradeoff: pay more per click, get more engagement per dollar once someone’s looking.
Let’s see if we’re a fit.
If the goal is the cheapest path to raw traffic or leads, Facebook is the better starting point. Lower average CPC, more placement inventory, and pricing that holds steadier when competition for ad space spikes.
If the business depends on visual discovery, meaning people deciding to buy based on how the product or space looks, Instagram’s higher engagement rate can be worth the higher Feed CPC, especially if most of the budget runs through Stories and Reels rather than the Feed, where the cost gap mostly disappears.
Most small businesses aren’t purely one or the other. The practical split: run the bulk of a lead-gen budget on Facebook, and test a smaller slice on Instagram Stories or Reels if the product is genuinely visual. Judge each by its own cost per lead rather than assuming one platform’s numbers apply to the other, since this piece just showed you they don’t.
For new advertisers testing this, $300 to $500 a month is enough to get a real read on both platforms, though Meta’s own floor is closer to $5 a day per ad set if you want to start smaller.
If you want help building out that split and reading the results instead of guessing at it, Social Media Advertising is where that work happens.
You don’t have to figure out the tools alone. Tell us where you’re stuck.
Ready to skip the agency BS and get results? We’re taking on new clients who want straight-shooting digital marketing that actually drives growth.
And hey, if you’re in Austin, TX and want to talk strategy over a pint, we’re down for that too.
Ready to skip the agency BS and get results? We’re taking on new clients who want straight-shooting digital marketing that actually drives growth.
And hey, if you’re in Austin, TX and want to talk strategy over a pint, we’re down for that too.